As a founder member of Mystery Women in 1997, promoting Crime Fiction has always been my passion.
Following the closure of Mystery Women, a new group was formed on 30th January 2012 promoting crime fiction.
New reviews are posted daily, but to search for earlier reviews please click on the Mystery People link below and select 'reviews' from the welcome page. This will display an alphabetic option for you to find the review you would like to read
For PREVIOUS REVIEWS- Click on MYSTERY PEOPLE below -
Published by No Exit Press, 24
May 2018. ISBN: 978-0-85730-203-8 (PB)
In crime fiction, except for those in which all the
villains die in a hail of bullets while the hero leaves town accompanied only
by his trusty toothbrush, the ultimate end is a trial in which the innocent are
acquitted and the guilty are convicted and receive their just deserts. Such is
justice. Straightforward? Not necessarily. Simple? Not really.
In the Crown Courts
of England and Wales where the more serious crimes are judged in front of a
judge and jury there is a whole series of legal rules which govern how a trial
is actually conducted and what evidence is admissible. Is this really
necessary? Or would it be better if trials were conducted purely on a ‘seat of
the pants basis’? What would really be in the interests of justice?
In London, where this
and the earlier book in the series which also featured Judge Walden are set,
Crown Courts range from the Old Bailey where cases of the utmost seriousness
are tried to small courts like the fictitious Bermondsey Crown Court where
Judge Walden, the presiding judge, and his three colleagues sit as judges.
Years of long experience and considerable legal knowledge enable them to apply apparently
strict legal rules to human behaviour which is infinitely variable in a way
which is as just and fair as possible. Judge Walden and his colleagues differ
from each other: he is elderly and has a fairly traditional attitude, but he is
not illiberal. When a female juror appears in court with a face veil, after
some thought he raises no objection: it is a juror’s job to judge the
truthfulness or otherwise of witnesses and a face veil will not prevent her
from doing so. One colleague has much more right-wing views and disapproves of
recent trends among lawyers: for instance, when a woman barrister appears with
her pink hair highly visible under her wig, only Judge Walden’s diplomatic
skills enable a reasonable compromise to be achieved. That judge and the only
woman judge, who had been a high-flying commercial lawyer and has a much more
modern attitude, frequently differ on such matters; it is Judge Walden who
resolves their disputes.
But it is not Judge
Walden’s fellow judges who cause real problems, it is the civil servants from
the Ministry of Justice, referred to as the Grey Smoothies, who constantly
reduce the resources available to the criminal justice system while insisting
that greater efficiency in the administration of justice will deal with any
problems. All too often, as the stories in this collection demonstrate, this
turns out to be anything but the case.
These stories are
witty and skilfully written yet have a light touch. My own feeling is that
writers and readers of crime fiction should read them so as to bear in mind
that the conclusion of the stories they write, which usually end in an arrest,
would in real life be but a stage in the story. In view of the inescapable
complexity of the criminal law and the rules of criminal evidence and procedure
it is probably just as well that the majority of crime stories avoid the trial.
Peter Murphy was born in 1946. After graduating from Cambridge
University he spent a career in the law, as an advocate and teacher, both in
England and the United States. His legal work included a number of years in The
Hague as defence counsel at the Yugoslavian War Crimes Tribunal. He lives with
his wife, Chris, in Cambridgeshire.
born in the U.S. but has lived in the U.K. since she was seven apart from seven
years in The Hague. She read law at university but did not go into practice.
Instead she worked for many years for a firm of law publishers and still does occasional
work for them including taking part in a substantial revision and updating of
her late husband’s legal practitioners’ work on Criminal Evidence published
late 2015. She has also contributed short stories with a distinctly criminal
flavour to two of the Oxford Stories anthologies published by Oxpens Press – a
third story is to be published shortly in another Oxford Stories anthology –
and is now concentrating on her own writing.